Typical Liberal/Conservative Banter over Iraq
LIBERAL: I have some concerns about our invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq. Do Bush’s foreign policy decisions concern you?
CONSERVATIVE: How dare you question our president?! We are at WAR!!! TRAITOR!!!!
LIBERAL: Well, why do you think we invaded Iraq EXACTLY when we did?
CONSERVATIVE: Because Iraq was an imminent threat--- they had WMD.
LIBERAL: Actually, Iraq has since been proven to NOT have been an imminent threat……… and WMD have not been found. That’s why most of you guys have already switched from the “WMD” claim to the “WMD Program” claim………
CONSERVATIVE: SO WHAT?!! They were in violation of UN Resolutions.
LIBERAL: Other countries have ignored UN mandates………….
Indonesia disregarded mandates to withdraw from East Timor, which finally won its independence in 1999, after a twenty-four-year-long U.S. occupation.
Turkey ignored resolutions 353 and 354 to leave Cyprus.
Several countries have had even more violations than Iraq…………. Israel has 30, Turkey has more than 20, Morocco has more than 15, etc.
Why don’t we care about THESE violations?
CONSERVATIVE: We DO care……. But Saddam was a vicious dictator, and we needed to liberate the Iraqi people.
LIBERAL: When did this administration become so concerned about THAT?
CONSERVATIVE: What do you mean?! BUSH ALWAYS cared!!!
LIBERAL: Was liberating Iraq at all “urgent” immediately upon Bushy taking office?
No.
Was liberating Iraq at all “urgent” to Bushy immediately following 9/11?
No.
It became “urgent” shortly before the midterm elections when Dubya needed something to divert our attention from our crappy economy. It was pushed in the name of Republican politics--- NOT immediate need.
CONSERVATIVE: Bull$hit!!!………. besides, Saddam supported terrorists.
LIBERAL: No...... Saddam gave money to the families of suicide bombers---- and not as much as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, etc. did. Therefore, it is disingenuous to claim that Iraq is part of this so-called “war on terror”, since we haven’t gone after THESE countries in like fashion.
Face it………. You and your ilk--- you typically jump to one of three “excuses” for invading Iraq:
1) They violated UN resolutions, or
2) Liberation of the Iraqi people, or
3) They supported terrorism.
Each of which is EASILY shot down…………
It is interesting to note that you and your ilk have all but given up on the “WMD” and “imminent threat” issues……………
CONSERVATIVE: YOU FACE IT!!!! YOU ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A YELLOW-BELLIED TRAITOR!!!! FVCK YOU--- YOU DUMB LIBERAL A$$HOLE!!!! FVCKING WHINING LIBERAL PIECE OF $HIT!!! I HOPE YOU DIE!!! KILL ALL LIBERALS!!!! AAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
(fade to black…….. CONSERVATIVE’S head explodes due to an overload of LIBERAL arguments rooted in logic and reason……….)
- Berkeley Guy
LIBERAL: I have some concerns about our invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq. Do Bush’s foreign policy decisions concern you?
CONSERVATIVE: How dare you question our president?! We are at WAR!!! TRAITOR!!!!
LIBERAL: Well, why do you think we invaded Iraq EXACTLY when we did?
CONSERVATIVE: Because Iraq was an imminent threat--- they had WMD.
LIBERAL: Actually, Iraq has since been proven to NOT have been an imminent threat……… and WMD have not been found. That’s why most of you guys have already switched from the “WMD” claim to the “WMD Program” claim………
CONSERVATIVE: SO WHAT?!! They were in violation of UN Resolutions.
LIBERAL: Other countries have ignored UN mandates………….
Indonesia disregarded mandates to withdraw from East Timor, which finally won its independence in 1999, after a twenty-four-year-long U.S. occupation.
Turkey ignored resolutions 353 and 354 to leave Cyprus.
Several countries have had even more violations than Iraq…………. Israel has 30, Turkey has more than 20, Morocco has more than 15, etc.
Why don’t we care about THESE violations?
CONSERVATIVE: We DO care……. But Saddam was a vicious dictator, and we needed to liberate the Iraqi people.
LIBERAL: When did this administration become so concerned about THAT?
CONSERVATIVE: What do you mean?! BUSH ALWAYS cared!!!
LIBERAL: Was liberating Iraq at all “urgent” immediately upon Bushy taking office?
No.
Was liberating Iraq at all “urgent” to Bushy immediately following 9/11?
No.
It became “urgent” shortly before the midterm elections when Dubya needed something to divert our attention from our crappy economy. It was pushed in the name of Republican politics--- NOT immediate need.
CONSERVATIVE: Bull$hit!!!………. besides, Saddam supported terrorists.
LIBERAL: No...... Saddam gave money to the families of suicide bombers---- and not as much as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, etc. did. Therefore, it is disingenuous to claim that Iraq is part of this so-called “war on terror”, since we haven’t gone after THESE countries in like fashion.
Face it………. You and your ilk--- you typically jump to one of three “excuses” for invading Iraq:
1) They violated UN resolutions, or
2) Liberation of the Iraqi people, or
3) They supported terrorism.
Each of which is EASILY shot down…………
It is interesting to note that you and your ilk have all but given up on the “WMD” and “imminent threat” issues……………
CONSERVATIVE: YOU FACE IT!!!! YOU ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A YELLOW-BELLIED TRAITOR!!!! FVCK YOU--- YOU DUMB LIBERAL A$$HOLE!!!! FVCKING WHINING LIBERAL PIECE OF $HIT!!! I HOPE YOU DIE!!! KILL ALL LIBERALS!!!! AAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
(fade to black…….. CONSERVATIVE’S head explodes due to an overload of LIBERAL arguments rooted in logic and reason……….)
- Berkeley Guy
1 Comments:
Hi.
I was delighted to find your comment on my article, and in return have to tell you that I laughed heartily reading this essay and will bookmark your blog. Keep up the good work.
Post a Comment
<< Home